There are two important foundations defining auditors‘ work as credible: objectivity and independence. Here we will discuss audit objectivity and the situations where it can be impacted.

Meaning of Objectivity

The institute of internal auditors defines objectivity as an unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no quality compromises are made.

Every certification that the auditor does perform requires him to be objective. Objectivity means that the auditor shall perform a balanced assessment of all relevant circumstances.

Objectivity requires auditors to be disciplined and have a balanced approach to all the audit performance tasks. It requires auditors to make effective communication as and when required, be it as per legal compliance or otherwise.

When the auditor finds something that may impact his opinion or other people involved in the audit, this creates a hindrance to audit and impairs objectivity.

Interpretation of Impairment

Impairment does not necessarily mean auditors are involved in fraud. Anything that impacts objectivity is termed as impairing. Auditors may have a conflict of interest in audit assignment that is impacting the objectivity of the audit.

Other aspects of impairment include the imposition of restriction of access to records, personnel and resource limitations, and so on. These are discussed below:

Main nature of the impairment

  1. Conflict of interest: The auditors are not to accept gifts, fees, or anything from auditee. The acceptance of such gifts may impair the auditor’s objectivity. The internal auditors are also required to immediately report any such offer to their supervisors if any. If friends and family are part of the auditee, this will impair the objectivity of auditee, resulting in sometimes conflict of interest. Providing consultancy services to auditee also creates a conflict of interest
  2. Scope Limitation: This limitation stops the auditor from accomplishing its plan and schedule. Scope limitation includes a restriction to approved staffing plan, work schedule, access to records and personnel, etc. among other things.
Related article  The applicable financial reporting framework

Circumstances impairing objectivity

Situations other than relating to audit evidence can lead to impairment of objectivity. This would result in bad decision making. There are various circumstances which can impair the objectivity of auditors as discussed below:

  • Prior Work: The auditors may be hired from within the company for an internal auditor position. Such auditors have worked in the place for years and developed a good rapport with management and made certain friends among the company personnel.  This may bring a perfect understanding of the client’s business but comes with the fact that such friendliness would hamper his ability to perform audit tasks completely. Let’s take an instant where the internal auditor is doing an audit of the accounts receivable department, and he finds certain mistakes are done, which are big and are done by an employee who is his friend. The internal auditor has to follow audit guidelines here but this circumstance is certainly going to harm his objectivity. The possibility of letting the matter slide cannot be ruled out, which is not good for the audit itself.
  • Temporary auditors: The internal auditors are not permanent but of a temporary nature. Company laws in various countries require the company to hire internal auditors up to 5 years tenure only with ratification in every year by the board of directors and shareholders. This may hamper the internal auditor’s mindset in securing the premises of still remaining the auditor for the as high number of years as possible. There are also circumstances where subject matter specialists are used for a short period. Although professional as they would be, since they are temporary nature, they may not be knowing the business aspects of enterprise very well. Let’s take an instance, where the valuation report of the building is to be prepared by engineers. This is a temporary assignment. In the shortest of duration, the engineer has to appraise the building as per the local rates and statutory circle rates. However, he may not include all the parts of the building in his report due to timing constraints. This is how the temporary appointments of subject matter experts may also hamper the internal auditors’ work as they would be relying on this report for their work as well.
  • Self-interest threat: The auditor’s objectivity can be impaired from brewing self-interest. Such impairments occur out from direct or indirect interest in a client. The auditor’s fear of losing a client can also result in a self-interest threat.
  • Self-review threat: Auditors face the most difficult work as they have to review their work by themselves. Peer reviewing in the audit industry is done of working papers and others and not directly of clients’ works. Peer review happens for a cluster of years and for the internal auditor. The auditor has to however perform self-review by himself at the spot of the client’s workplace. The auditor has to also review previous audit assignments or non-audit assignment and he may come in a situation, where he has to challenge such reports to arrive at audit conclusions.
Related article  Planning Materiality: Definition, Example, and Calculation

Written by hdadarkpassenger