HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDITORS MAINTAIN INDEPENDENCE?

Auditor independence basically refers to the independence of the interior auditor or of the external auditor from parties which will have a financial interest within the business being audited.

Independence requires integrity and an objective approach to the audit process. The concept requires the auditor to hold out his or her work freely and in an objective manner.

Internal audit plays a crucial role during a company. consistent with the IIA (1999), “Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to feature value and improve an organization’s operations.

It helps a corporation accomplish its objectives by bringing a scientific, disciplined approach to gauge and improve the effectiveness of risk management.

Independence of the interior auditor means independence from parties whose interests could be harmed by the results of an audit. Specific internal management issues are inadequate risk management, inadequate internal controls, and poor governance. to make sure their independence, internal auditors must perform their work freely and objectively.

They can’t subordinate their judgment on audit matters thereto of others, and that they should have the support from senior management, the board of directors, and therefore the audit committee. Use the after work out internal audit independence.

Within the ideal circumstances, the person performing an audit should haven’t any relationship to the party being audited. The shortage of a relationship prevents bias from getting into the audit findings. In corporate settings, a corporation hires an indoor auditor or establishes a contract to get internal or external audit services, workplace relationship is made.

Governmental rules, professional ethics policies, and industry standards are put into place to further promote auditor objectivity in these situations. Internal auditors are directly hired or contract employees of the corporate being audited. Their overall objectivity could be doubtful as they have to satisfy management levels to urge paid. Rules to attenuate bias specializes in eliminating conflicts of interest.

Related article  What is the difference between the audit partner and the engagement partner?

How does internal auditing maintain its independence and objectivity?

The audit charter should establish the independence of the interior audit activity by the twin reporting relationship to management and therefore the organization’s most senior oversight group.

Specifically, the CAE should report back to the executive management for assistance in establishing direction, support, as well as administrative interface; and typically to the audit committee for strategic direction, reinforcement, and accountability. the interior auditors should have access to records and personnel as necessary, and be allowed to use appropriate probing techniques without impediment.

OBJECTIVITY: to take care of objectivity, internal auditors should haven’t any personal or professional involvement with or allegiance to the world being audited; and will maintain an unbiased and impartial mindset about all engagements.Independence and objectivity are two critical components of effective internal audit activity.

“The auditor occupies a singular position. He or she is used by the management but is additionally expected to review the conduct of management which may create significant tension since the interior auditor’s independence from management is important for the auditor to objectively assess the management’s action, but the interior auditor’s dependence on the management for employment is extremely clear.”

Therefore, the interior audit activity should have a mandate through a written audit charter that establishes its purpose, authority, and responsibility to support its independence and objectivity within a corporation. Internal auditors are independent once they render impartial and unbiased judgment within the conduct of their engagement.

To make sure this independence, best practices suggest the CAE should report on to the audit committee or its equivalent. For day-to-day administrative purposes, the CAE should report back to the foremost senior executive (i.e., the chief military officer [CEO]) of the organization.

Related article  Risks-based Audit Approach - How Does It Work?

The CAE should have direct communication with the audit committee, which reinforces the organizational status of internal auditing, enables full support and unrestricted access to organizational resources, and ensures that there’s no impairment to independence.

 Objectivity may be an attitude that internal auditors should maintain while performing engagements. the interior auditor should have an impartial, unbiased attitude and avoid conflict-of-interest situations, as that might prejudice his/her ability to perform the duties objectively.

The results of internal audit work should be reviewed before they’re released to supply an inexpensive assurance that the work has been performed objectively.

Internal auditors shouldn’t assume any operational responsibility. Objectivity is often presumed to be impaired when internal auditors perform an assurance review of any activity that they had any authority or responsibility within the past year or a period significant enough to influence their judgment or opinion.

Internal auditors shouldn’t accept gifts or favors from others like employees, clients, or business associates.

The interior auditors should adopt a policy that endorses their commitment to abiding by the Code of Ethics, avoiding conflicts of interest, disclosing any activity that would end in a possible conflict of interest. Staff assignment of internal auditors should be rotated periodically whenever it’s practicable.