The qualified audit report is one of the three modified audit reports where the opinion is issued to the financial statements that are not prepared in all material respect while those misstatements are not pervasive.

Compare to the other two reports, this one is less serious than yet it is below the clean opinion.

The qualified audit report is different from the other two modified reports since the misstatement found by auditors effect only for the items themselves.

While adverse and disclaimer, the misstatements might be effect the whole financial statements.

The simple meaning of qualified audit report is that the accounting information that presents in the financial statements is not correct.

This could mean the accounting treatment is not follow accounting standards like IFRS, US GAAP or local GAAP.

In the qualified audit report, there is a qualified audit opinion that expresses by auditors and stating the reason why the qualified opinion is expressed.


Now assuming that you know what is the qualified report and the following is the explanation based on International Standard on Auditing (ISA) issued by IFAC.

Based on ISA 700, the auditor should express the unmodified audit opinion to the financial statements that they audit if they conclude and found no material misstatements.

And if, after their testing, and they concluded that the material misstatements found, and the client is not making adjustments as auditors recommend, then qualified opinion should be express in the qualified audit report.

But, just to be sure that those misstatements are not pervasive to financial statements.

Related article  Audit Reports: Types of Audit Reports | Advantages | Limitation

That means that besides affecting themselves, the misstatements are not affected to other items in the financial statements.

To make sure the opinion issued to the client is done as it should be, the auditor should check and follow the recommendation and guidelines in ISA 700, and ISA 705.

Auditors should state the detail information related to qualified opinion in the basic opinion paragraph.

For example, detail of misstatements, how they are the effect, and what the standard said about that misstatement.

Then, in the qualified opinion paragraph, the auditor should statement clearly the financial statements that they audit, period cover, accounting standard they use to prepare financial statements, and conclusion of their opinion based on the misstatements found and state in the basis opinion paragraph.


Now you have understood the meaning and principle of the qualified audit report, and now let go to the example. For example, ABC engages with the Wiki accounting firm to audit its 31 December 2015 financial statements.

As a result of wiki accounting testing, it found and conclude that the account payable balance at the end of the period does not exist.

As the result of wiki assessment against ABC materiality set by the wiki, this misstatement is material, but not pervasive. Wiki tries to propose adjustments yet, management did not agree.

Wiki also explains the result of ABC rejection but ABC still not accept. Then, based on ISA 705, Wiki should express a qualified opinion to ABC financial statements.

Here is a sample:

Qualified audit opinion

Difference to other reports

While the unmodified report is issued to the financial statements that present true and fair view as well as compliance with the applicable law, the qualified report might be issued the financial statements that auditors found certain items of the financial statements are materially misstated. It is also possible that the qualified report is issued when then the scope of the audit is limited.

Related article  Difference Between Unqualified and Qualified Opinion

For example, the auditor might not be able to verify the existence of inventories balance that state in the balance sheet that backdates in two or three years. The reason is that they could not observe the inventories count at the year-end of dated that inventories were count.

In most cases, the qualified report is ok for both the management of the company as well as the regulator.

However, if the report is not clean like the disclaimer report as well as an adverse report, then the integrity of the report and management of the company is questionable.

Written by Sinra