Over the last two decades, the auditing profession has suffered from various scandals such as Enron and other high-profile audit scam settlements. The involvement of PwC in the Satyam scandal has brought it to its knees in an operational environment in India.
Such is the scenario that once the auditor or firm is engaged in the scandal, their career is literally over. Audit liability has increased many folds since the scam of Enron.
The liabilities have also enhanced the audit quality and reputation of the profession. This has also created barriers to new entries within the core audit market in itself.
Auditors are required to show two major skills while carrying out activities as independence and competence.
Auditors should have the required skills to carry out their job with due care and fairly. An auditor is also expected to complete tasks in good faith and integrity.
The auditor’s liability represents the legal liability that is assumed when the auditor is performing professional duties.
This forces auditors to be professionally competent and employ all the auditing and accounting standards carefully.
The auditor who performs his duties negligibly can face suit from the company, its shareholders, or even creditors who rely on auditors’ work.
The auditor can be held responsible for financial disadvantage to the firm caused by incorrect representation of the company’s books. This leads the auditors to take out professional liability insurance.
Types of Auditors liability
Auditors are potentially liable for both criminal and civil offenses. Criminal liabilities occur when the organization breaches the law or regulation.
On the other hand, disputes between individuals and/or organizations tantamount to civil liability.
Auditors are bound by the laws and regulations of the state or countries they operate in. They have also bound the ethics applicable to them as issued by the auditing boards.
Auditors under criminal law can be prosecuted for acts such as fraud and insider trading.
The audit is subject to legislation as per the Companies Act of the country. This Act includes the sections on auditors’ qualifications, how they can be appointed, and what would be their functions.
As per general law, the auditors can be prosecuted in criminal court for either knowingly or recklessly issuing an inappropriate audit opinion.
This relates to issues related to contract law and the law of tort. The contract law seeks parties for breach of contractual obligations.
That would mean the company can seek remedy from auditors only in terms of the engagement letter.
Therefore, the shareholders can sue the auditors directly in terms of the letter of engagement for failing to handle work with due care.
Firms must manage their exposure to claims of intelligence. It means applying audit standards and code of ethics for auditors and complying with terms and conditions as agreed in the engagement letter.
The audit firms should also invest time and money to make the improvements happen. The firm would improve audit only when it will lead to a long-term reduction of legal and insurance costs.
Disclaimers of liability
Auditors can be exposed to litigation from third-person parties for whom they have not disclaimed liability. Hence, it is necessary to include a disclaimer of liability in the workings of the audit reports.
Disclaimers can not be entirely reduced. Further, the laws do not protect from threats from litigations under contract law.
Liability Limitation Agreements
Limited liability agreements have been used a lot in recent years to reduce threats of litigations from clients.
LLAs are included in terms of engagement that impose a certain threshold of the amount of compensation collected from the auditor in case of litigation.
Such LLAs are to be approved by auditors annually and generally to be ascertained fairly and reasonably by the judges when the case arises.
It isn’t easy to estimate a fair and reasonable amount while setting a letter of engagement. This is because the threshold has to be estimated before any potential litigation known to the auditor and client.
Therefore, the level of compensation would be very discretionary and sometimes open to court as well in extreme circumstances.
It has to be noted that litigations in the field of the audit profession have been rapidly increasing. The potential costs and risks of auditing large corporates would increase for auditors outside the Big Four.
The brunt of penalties that auditor’s misdemeanors can attract may damage the capital markets. Until and unless things change, auditors should take bear the burden of liability.